Trust committee addresses mandate controversy

The Islands Trust (IT) plans to give greater online prominence to a recent reinterpretation of its mandate, while simultaneously seeming to downplay its significance.

Members of the IT Governance Committee indicated they thought much of the recent criticism of that reinterpretation came due to the public misunderstanding it — and placed blame on a communications process that resulted in a summary being released via a “business highlights” newsletter.

The committee voted Monday, Jan. 15 to re-post the full three-paragraph statement of consensus in a “prominent and easily accessible location” on the Trust’s website — and that “any other summaries or highlight statements on the website be removed.”

The committee advanced the plan having received a promised memo on the issue from Bowen Island municipal trustee — and committee chair — Judith Gedye.

“I think that there was some nuance lost in the summary,” said Gedye. “This was talking about the legality of Section 3 in the legal interpretation; it doesn’t change policy.”

Gedye and other trustees have been subjected to a barrage of public input since the consensus statement emerged last fall. In a two-hour-long closed-to-the-public discussion held on North Pender Island in September, trustees had what was called a “lengthy discussion” about the interpretation of Section 3 of the Islands Trust Act, commonly referred to as the “object” or “mandate”— specifying what the body aims to “preserve and protect.”

Rather than a formal rise and report, the Driftwood — and the wider public — had its first look at the statement of consensus when a link to it was embedded in a file published as part of the Trust Executive Committee’s Oct. 11, 2023 meeting agenda packet.

A subsequent “highlights” release included language from the consensus statement that seems to have caused the biggest stir — that the “unique amenities” the Trust protects were “broad-ranging and may include issues such as, but not limited to, housing, livelihoods, infrastructure and tourism.”

The consensus statement does continue in later language, left out of the “highlights” — but printed in the Driftwood’s Oct. 11, 2023 story — which added that land use planning “must always include a focus on preserving and protecting the environment and communities.”

As of press time, the consensus statement could still be found via the “Business Highlights” page. Direct links can be found by scrolling back on the Trust’s LinkedIn and Instagram pages.

Sign up for our newsletter and stay informed

Receive news headlines every week with our free email newsletter.

Other stories you might like

Trust mulls higher pay for next term’s trustees

The often-thorny issue of remuneration for elected officials will be front and centre at the next Islands Trust Council meeting, with members planning to...

Opinion: Consider Islands Trust OCP/LUB and planning history

By JOHN MONEY I thought it might be a good idea to delve into the history of our official community plans (OCPs) and land use...

Trust eyes bigger tax bump

Numbers rose and fell during deliberations — and could do either again in the months ahead, officials cautioned — but islanders hoping Trust Council...

Province turns down Trust review request – again

The government of B.C. has responded to the Islands Trust Council’s latest request for a governance review — and in a word, the answer...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Weather

Salt Spring Island
few clouds
12.9 ° C
13.1 °
11.7 °
77 %
1kmh
20 %
Mon
19 °
Tue
17 °
Wed
15 °
Thu
14 °
Fri
13 °