Home Blog Page 175

Prize-winning cheesecake recipe shared 

0

Driftwood columnist Paul McElroy won the Harbour House Perpetual Trophy for Best Dessert at this year’s Salt Spring Fall Fair for his Dulce De Leche Cheesecake. He has graciously provided the recipe for publication, below. As well, recipes from four other baking and preserves category winners are included in the Driftwood’s Harvest Time publication, inside the print edition of this paper.  

First, make your dulce de leche. You can occasionally find it ready-made in the shops, but it’s super easy to make your own.  

All you need is a can of sweetened condensed milk. Peel the label off, put it into a large saucepan of room-temperature water at least two inches over the can, bring to a boil and boil for three hours, topping it up with boiling water every 30 minutes or so. 

(Avoid the pull ring cans, they can leak during the boiling and spill everything.) 

Lift can with tongs from boiling water and allow to cool completely on a wire rack before opening. Do not attempt to open the can while still hot; the pressurized hot caramel can spray dangerously.  

The dulce de leche can be made weeks ahead, just keep it unopened in the fridge until you’re ready to use it. 

Ingredients: 

12 graham crackers  

1 ½ c. granulated sugar, divided 

¼ tsp. kosher salt 

5 Tbsp. (72 g) unsalted butter, melted and cooled, plus more for greasing the pan 

4  225-g packages cream cheese, at room temperature 

½ tsp. vanilla extract 

4 large eggs 

½ c. sour cream 

½ c. prepared dulce de leche 

Method: 

Preheat oven to 350°F. 

It’s important that the cheesecake cooks slowly and evenly. You don’t want it to rise and crack. 

Wrap three layers of aluminum foil around the outside of a 9-inch springform cake tin with 3-inch-high sides. Try to get the wide rolls of foil, it makes the job so much easier! 

Grease the tin with butter. I also cut a circle of parchment paper and line the bottom of the tin. The cake will lift from the base of the tin much more easily when it’s cooked. 

Combine graham crackers, ¼ c. sugar and salt in a food processor and pulse until crumbly. Add melted butter, and pulse until moistened. Press the crumb mixture evenly onto bottom and 1 ½ inches up sides of the prepared pan. Bake in preheated oven just until golden brown, about 15 minutes. Let cool completely in the fridge while you prepare the filling. Turn the oven temperature down to 325°F. 

In an electric mixer, beat cream cheese on medium speed until fluffy. Don’t beat it for too long. Add vanilla and remaining 1 1/4 c. sugar and beat until combined. 

Add eggs, one at a time, beating until well combined after each addition. Add sour cream, and beat until smooth, about 35 seconds. 

Take out one cup of the filling and put it into a separate medium bowl. Add the dulce de leche to the filling in the bowl and whisk until the dulce de leche is fully incorporated, making sure there are no lumps of the caramel. Pour the plain cheesecake filling into the cooled crust. Drizzle dulce de leche filling over top and using a knife or chopstick, swirl to create a marbled effect. Don’t just plonk the dulce de leche on top of the main filling, squiggle it with a pointed spoon onto the white filling before pulling the knife or chopstick through it. 

Now carefully place the cheesecake in a large baking pan and add hot water to the pan to come about an inch up the side of the springform pan. Bake until almost set (the centre will move slightly when the pan is gently shaken) but not puffed, about 1 hour and 15 minutes, depending on your oven. The last 20 minutes or so are critical: leave it too long and the cheesecake will brown on top, and you’ll lose the lovely marble effect. It will still taste wonderful, but not look as beautiful. 

Let the cheesecake cool at room temperature for two hours. Cover loosely with plastic wrap, and refrigerate, still in the tin, until completely cooled, at least six hours or preferably overnight. 

Officials press for wildfire DPA 

0

Two agencies tasked with emergency management and response approached Salt Spring’s Local Trust Committee (LTC) last week to ask for special requirements and guidelines for developers looking to build in areas on the island at higher risk for fire.  

“I don’t pretend to be a governance expert,” chuckled Salt Spring Island Fire Rescue (SSIFR) Chief Jamie Holmes, who addressed trustees at their regular meeting Thursday, Sept. 14. But, he said, the district was again recommending the LTC add a wildfire hazard development permit area (DPA) within  Salt Spring Island’s official community plan (OCP).  

Holmes said SSIFR was hoping for a governing document with a multi-pronged approach, beginning with an educational portion — on creating defensible spaces between wildland and parks, buildings and houses — and a prescriptive portion, dealing with ensuring adequate water supplies to fight fires at and around new development.  

“We make recommendations that developers can ignore,” said Holmes. “We have no way of enforcement on that. Unfortunately, we see major subdivisions being put in that don’t have any water supply capabilities [for firefighting] that are backing on major forest interfaces; if anything happened on either side, the transition between the two worlds would happen quickly. And we’d have very little way of stopping that.”  

The third prong would be restrictive measures, Holmes said, surrounding building materials used in the first place that might be more susceptible to spreading wildfire — such as cedar shake roofing.  

“Buildings tend to burn from the top down,” said Holmes. “And so if we can look at materials that help us, that goes a long way.”  

Holmes emphasized the importance of defensible spaces in particular for firefighter efficacy — and safety.  

“If we don’t have those areas we can defend, if we don’t have acres we can work off of, honestly, we put our members at risk,” said Holmes. “So we need to have spaces to ‘anchor’ attacks off of, that provide us with the safety and ability to work.”  

Jonathan Reimer, Fire and Emergency Programs manager for the Capital Regional District (CRD), shared Holmes’ concerns.  

“Obviously in the recent weeks and months, we’ve all been paying close attention to the wildfire disasters that we’ve seen in Maui, West Kelowna, Lytton and other places,” said Reimer. “And wildfire resilience is something that’s, I think, close to the heart of most of our residents — and it’s something that is a shared responsibility between the Islands Trust as land manager, CRD as local government, and a series of improvement districts and societies.”  

The good news, according to Reimer, is that the recently completed Community Wildfire Resiliency Plan for Salt Spring Island — which examined ecology, fuel systems and fire history for the island and produced a wildfire risk map, along with recommendations for how to improve things — found that wildfire risk across Salt Spring can broadly be described as “moderate.”  

“And moderate wildfire risk means that the fires that have the highest intensity, like what we saw on Maui and in West Kelowna, are quite unlikely here,” said Reimer.   

That does not mean, he added, that we should underestimate the potential impact of “moderate” intensity fire — including the loss of structures and the displacement of people for an extended amount of time. And, Reimer said, recent mapping showed most of the wildfire risk on Salt Spring stemmed from private land; the joint project between the Islands Trust and CRD created a “wildfire exposure” map that looked at the distribution of risk geographically, and across all land ownership classes.  

“I think we probably need to start working together at a higher level than we have in the past,” said Reimer. “I know the issue of fragmented governance is something that is a continual challenge for our island communities, [but] an effective wildfire response will require all of us to work together in novel ways.”  

That would include, he said, partnering to implement the plan’s recommendations — including the creation of a wildfire-specific DPA, as Holmes and SSIFR had requested, as well as a development approval information provision, development application materials and designating wildfire hazard areas in the next OCP update. Importantly, funding for much of that work could be obtained through provincial programs, not unlike those that fund FireSmart efforts already.  

“Some of the activities that we would like to see done could be done by the Islands Trust,” said Reimer, “and we could pursue the funding through our [CRD] side and have an arrangement to provide you with some of the resources to complete the work.”  

RIEP impact survey seeks respondents

0

Time is running out for local workers and businesses to weigh in on challenges and opportunities for sustainable economic development, according to organizers of a survey.

Earlier this year, the Rural Islands Economic Partnership (RIEP) was awarded a provincial grant through the Ministry of Jobs, Economic Development and Innovation’s Rural Economic Diversification and Infrastructure Program to study what rural island business owners and workers think about the ecological and social impacts of our collective economic activities in B.C. The project’s purpose is to identify what resources businesses and workers need to manage those impacts, as well as ideas on how RIEP can help deliver that support to island communities.

The work begins, according to organizers, with a 15-question survey — aimed at anyone who owns, operates, manages or works at a business on a rural island. This includes artists and artisans, freelancers and entrepreneurs. The answers can help bring additional resources to support B.C.’s rural island and coastal community economies.

Once the research is complete, RIEP will deliver a full report to the provincial government, along with its recommendations.

To participate in the survey, visit riep.ca/impact by Friday, Sept. 22.

Phoenix Elementary closing its doors 

0

Declining enrolment — and a corresponding operational budget deficit — has spelled the end for Salt Spring’s Phoenix Elementary School, with no students registered and an official closing set for this fall. 

With only 34 students enrolled last year — down from nearly twice as many in 2018 — the alternative K-7 school operated within Gulf Islands School District 64 (SD64) will likely close without significant student disruption, the Board of Education heard at its meeting Wednesday, Sept. 13. 

“Students and families were making choices elsewhere within our system, by and large,” said superintendent Scott Ben- well. “This was a ‘natural’ school closure, if I can call it that.” 

The publicly funded alternative school has been in operation since 1991, and was known for small, multi-age classrooms and its cooperative, family-centred learning approach; during the 2022-23 school year, however, Phoenix Elementary operated at an estimated $90,000 deficit. 

Since spring of last year, noting the trend of continued declining registration, district officials reached out to parents — in con- sideration of budget, but also of the impact on a student’s learning experience a cohort size of less than six students may have. 

Benwell said staff worked with the par- ents of existing (and potentially continuing) students to address that significant decline in registration, and through that work — supporting families in their decision-making, Benwell said — staff were confident that in recommending the closure they weren’t leaving anyone behind. 

Indeed, school administrators ultimate- ly received no new registration requests throughout the spring and summer months, and began the year with no stu- dents enrolled in the school. Teaching staff have all been relocated elsewhere — a con- versation “well received” by those teachers, Benwell added. 

“One way of looking at it is that the consultation process is going to be abbreviated,” said Lori Deacon, acting director of corporate services. “We don’t have staff to consult with, we don’t have a parent advisory council to consult with. There are no families at the school.” 

As a result, the board voted to begin the requisite 60-day consultation period immediately; after another public meeting at the school on 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, Oct. 16, an official vote to close the school through bylaw will occur Monday, Nov. 13. 

“The demographic of Phoenix has changed over the last couple of years,” said deputy superintendent D’Arcy Deacon, noting that the vast majority of the students that have been at the school during the declining enrolment period have been upper intermediate students — who have naturally integrated into Gulf Islands Secondary School. 

“Early last year, we were looking at between two and three students for a primary program at Phoenix,” he said. “When we met with families in the end, it was five students [remaining] who chose to go to other places.” 

The official vote to permanently close the school will take place immediately following the 60 days, rather than at a regular school board meeting, to allow the still-attached principal at Phoenix to be re-assigned as soon as possible. 

It was also worth moving up, according to D’arcy Deacon, so the board could begin to contemplate the future of the school-owned property on Drake Road. 

“The sooner [the official closure] happens, the sooner options to explore use of that space for potential revenue generation, or other options, can start to move forward,” he said. 

SCOTT, Justin (Woody) Montcrieff

1

Feb 24 1972-Aug 21 2023

Woody was pre deceased by his father Jim and is survived by his mother Wendy, brothers Corbin(Jenn) and Morgain(Ramona)and sister Alanna. Mary Lou who knew and loved him his entire life,nieces Kyra and Helena and nephew Liam, Aunt Karen, family Greg (Kyla), Brandon and Tanner.


Woody you are one of a kind! You always listened and responded with kind and well thought out advice. You gave people the benefit of the doubt never judged or looked down upon anyone and would always put others before yourself. You will be missed deeply but never forgotten. Rest in peace.

Meadowbrook celebrates 20th anniversary

0

Meadowbrook seniors residence celebrated its 20th anniversary on Saturday with cake, the honouring of its founders and acknowledgement of the independent living complex’s 205 past and present residents.

Gulf Islands Seniors Residence Association (GISRA) owns the facility, after becoming a charitable organization in 1999 and then purchasing the land and an existing house at 121 Atkins Rd. the following year.

With no government funding available at the time, acquiring the property and building the 38-unit complex relied on significant financial contributions from a number of dedicated and capable individuals. GISRA executive director Harry Barnes said when reviewing Meadowbrook’s history it was amazing to see how much time and money those people put into making the vision a reality, noting Mary Toynbee, in particular, as well as Gordon English and a number of others.

“If there’s one person we want to say that we owe the most to it’s Mary Toynbee,” said Barnes.

Not only was her name on most of the letters going out to various parties, but she and her husband Manson ended up forgiving a substantial loan they had made to GISRA.

Interestingly, Toynbee lived for 19 years at Meadowbrook, the longest of any other resident, until her death last year. That fact emerged while current GISRA president Helen Hinchliff was compiling a list of everyone who had lived at Meadowbrook and for how long since it opened. With that information she created a number of “posthumous prizes” related to age and longevity during her presentation at the party on Saturday.

It turns out the “grandest-age person” to move into Meadowbrook and continue living there to the “ripest age” was Nancy Keith Murray. She became a Meadowbrook resident in 2005 at the age of 97 and was the first to celebrate her 100th birthday as a resident.

Others who were at least 90 when they arrived and in a similar category were Marjorie Beggs, Hilda Bennett, Pat Herchmer, Bob Kertland, Don “Goodie” Goodman and Anne Mouat.

Barnes and Hinchliff note that the more common denominator at Meadowbrook is that residents are happy there.

“People love living here,” said Barnes. “It’s interesting to know why they would love it because, obviously, a lot of the people are not in the best of health and they’re at the time of their lives where death is around the corner. So why would this be a happy place? But it is. It’s interesting . . . What chemistry is happening here that makes it be that way? I don’t know.”

Hinchliff said the key is that residents like each other.

“They really get a lot out of their daily chats together, you know, over coffee or dinner or whatever,” she said.

Barnes and Hinchliff said residents also love the staff, and GISRA has made a concerted effort in recent years to retain those valued individuals through improved compensation and a pension plan.

People also appreciate the safety and security Meadowbrook provides, perhaps not realizing how stressful it was to be maintaining a large home and property, especially if that person was widowed.

Meadowbrook has a thorough screening process to ensure applicants are a good fit. Residents must be able to live independently, although some services such as the evening meal and housekeeping are available. A variety of social and recreational activities also take place.

“That’s the legacy, isn’t it?” said Barnes. “In 20 years, we’ve provided a wonderful home for lots of people.”

Unfortunately, he said, many seniors postpone the decision to make the transition and by then it is too late to go the independent living route.

“They think they want to stay in their own homes — they see this as ‘the home’ rather than a way of life and a place where they can come and live. This is not just the situation for us. The whole independent living industry has the same problem.”

GISRA also owns a property on Kings Lane that includes the Salt Spring Island Health Centre and a portion currently being leased to BC Housing for supportive-housing purposes where it has planned for a number of years to build a second residential complex for seniors. But Barnes said that plan is now being re-examined as the business case may no longer make sense. A consultant will soon be looking at the different scenarios with options for the GISRA board and staff to consider.

ADUs: a Salt Spring tradition that should be revived

0

SUBMITTED BY SALT SPRING SOLUTIONS

Salt Spring Island needs more effective ways to learn about and discuss important, complex and controversial issues. At Salt Spring Solutions, our goal is to bring more people power into our island’s decision-making processes. We hope to see Salt Spring evolve into a community that can work effectively together on solving complex issues and make the sometimes-difficult decisions on how to improve lives and protect our island ecology.

Take housing, for instance. We’re interested in solutions to our housing crisis that minimize environmental impacts, maximize forest and farmland preservation, make efficient use of existing infrastructure and resources, and improve the diversity, availability and affordability of long-term homes for locals.

Although Salt Spring is widely known as an idyllic place to spend a weekend in a cozy cabin, a yurt in the forest, or a tiny home on an agricultural property, did you know that these, and other types of accessory dwelling units (ADUs), are mostly prohibited here as long-term rentals?

ADUs, sometimes known as granny flats, secondary suites and small cottages, were a small but integral part of the housing stock up until the 1970s on Salt Spring Island.  Since the days of early homesteads and family farms, most properties had one or more small dwellings in addition to a larger primary house. Islanders have lived in cabins, above barns and garages and in secondary suites for generations. These accessory dwellings housed adult children or extended family members, farm workers or other employees, or were leased for rental income.

According to the Salt Spring Island Housing Needs Report (CRD, 2020), secondary suites constituted roughly one in 13 homes permitted before the 1980s. Since 2000, virtually no legal secondary suites have been constructed. The rise of 1970s zoning practices largely prohibited the construction of suites in favour of detached homes. This has resulted in the homogeneous and imbalanced housing stock that we have today that is not serving our community’s needs.

ADUs are a unique housing solution because they are funded, built and managed by individual property owners, usually home-owners who reside on the same property. The property owner can generate income to help pay their mortgage or house extended family or community members, or age in place on their property by moving into the smaller dwelling and renting out the larger house, or house an on-site caregiver in the ADU. ADUs provide affordable housing in a unique way, and also:

• maintain the existing character of the neighbourhood while gently increasing density, and reduce sprawl by making use of already developed residential land, infrastructure, and services;

• require fewer resources to build and maintain than larger detached homes, and are easier to finance and less expensive to build than multi-unit housing like townhomes and apartments;

• respond to the overall trend toward decreasing household size and increasing demand for small dwellings;

• support multi-generational and communal living, informal companionship, and child-care, increased safety and shared maintenance.

Several attempts to reprioritize ADUs for long-term rentals have been made in the past 20 years. Many policies in our most recent Official Community Plan (2008) support the need for a range of housing types, including ADUs. Studies indicate that, without any regulation or subsidy, about one in five ADUs are occupied for rents that are zero or far below market rates. That’s because the great majority of these units are being built for friends and family, such as grandparents or adult children. Homeowners who build ADUs are often not doing it as a for-profit real estate investment, but rather are choosing to prioritize something other than financial return. 

Some people are concerned that legalizing ADUs will contribute to overpopulation, stress freshwater resources, negatively impact the natural environment and be misused as short-term vacation rentals. While these are legitimate questions to raise, the experience of other small communities where ADUs are legalized for long-term housing demonstrates that those hesitancies can be addressed.

Overpopulation

Given the high cost of construction, legalizing ADUs for long-term occupancy is more about creating a path for legalizing existing ADUs and allowing modest increases in specific areas, especially for multi-generational living, rather than creating a lot of new housing stock all over the island. It is an important homeowner–initiated and –funded solution.

Water and Wastewater

The permit process requires that potable water and wastewater requirements are addressed prior to getting a building permit for an ADU. Construction of ADUs is only allowed if there is enough potable water and proper wastewater treatment. In addition to this safeguard, data gathered by Salt Spring Island Watershed Protection Alliance shows that current standards require far more water to be available on each residential property than is typically used.

Sensitive Ecosystems

The same setbacks, development permit area guidelines, and provincial and federal regulations that safeguard ecologically sensitive areas (wetlands, shorelines and community well capture areas) from the potential impacts of building detached houses also apply to ADUs.

Short-Term Rentals

Currently, short-term occupancy in ADUs is widely allowed for seasonal cottages and tourist accommodations, while long-term occupancy is not. This needs to be flipped to allow more legal long-term rental homes for locals. Zoning and business licensing are the existing tools used in other communities that could equitably regulate short-term rentals without preventing long-term occupancy.

At Salt Spring Solutions we envision being part of a community that works across areas of interest and issue-based divisions to identify key problems that require attention, to open up closed or obscure decision-making processes and convene respectful fact-based dialogue to find community-led solutions to our big hairy problems.

What do you think about using ADUs as one part of the solution to solve our community’s housing crisis? To join the conversation and learn more visit saltspringsolutions.com.

Four local government meetings in 26 hours

0

Islanders engaged with local public affairs will find themselves having to make a tough choice this week as two major government bodies have meetings going on at the same time.

Both the Salt Spring Local Trust Committee (LTC) and the Salt Spring Local Community Commission (LCC) will meet on Thursday, Sept. 14. The LCC meets at the Salt Spring Island Multi Space boardroom beginning at 9 a.m., while the LTC meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. just below at the School District 64 Learning Hub. Both meetings can be accessed through livestreaming.

LCC chair Earl Rook apologized for the inconvenience resulting from the LCC inadvertently ending up with the same meeting date as the LTC, which sets its schedule for the calendar year. He said meeting guidelines are being worked on now for adoption in the next few months.

Also taking place on Thursday, Sept. 14, but in the evening, is the Salt Spring Fire Protection District’s town hall meeting about the new fire hall project and the 2024 budget. That session is at Community Gospel Chapel from 7 to 9 p.m.

The night before (Sept. 13), the LTC will hold a town hall meeting at Beaver Point Hall from 5 to 7 p.m., which can also be livestreamed through the Trust website.

Editorial: Data should prove useful for Trust

1

Newspaper people, like policy-makers, love numbers.  

In a world where perspective is myriad and perception often myopic, numbers give us a chance to find broad common ground or a shared foundation we can use to talk about larger issues.

Here, much credit is due the Islands Trust staff in Victoria for starting the work to query Statistics Canada and bring us all some highly localized numbers. We can particularly thank Trust Area Services director Clare Frater, who has clearly been a driving force for the initiative. 

Now we have local numbers to confirm, or contradict, what we’ve all “seen.” The population on Salt Spring, for example, is indeed growing quickly — there are 50 per cent more of us than there were 30 years ago. But it happened even faster on some other islands, like Mayne, where population grew by 77 per cent, Bowen where it doubled, or South Pender’s Local Trust Area, where it grew by 126 per cent. 

And as the “shelter cost” for both renters and homeowners grew across B.C. over the last five years, it grew slightly less within the Islands Trust, where it’s still somehow less expensive to put a roof over one’s head than the provincial average — less surprising, perhaps, if one remembers half of B.C. lives in the upscale confines of Metro Vancouver, or that on several of our islands the percentage of “inadequate” housing is double the average. 

Indeed, numbers often deliver as many questions as they do answers. Why is the gender wage gap so pronounced on Bowen, but narrowed to nearly zero on Lasqueti? With Salt Spring and Mayne islands having nearly the same population density, why did the home ownership rate climb on one and fall on the other? And why is the percentage of households spending 30 per cent or more of their income on “shelter costs” so different from one island to the next? Wages? Housing availability?  

Policy-makers, like the rest of us, have a lot to work out with all this new information. But surely we can agree that knowing more is a good thing, and we welcome better opportunities for more informed decisions.  

Now we’ll see if our elected officials take advantage of those opportunities as a result.

Fifteen-year-old Goddard wins tennis title

By MARJORIE BLACKWOOD

SPECIAL TO THE DRIFTWOOD

When Mother Nature decreed a rainstorm take place on the afternoon of Sunday, Sept. 3, tournament director Justene Tedder and competitors were sent scurrying across the road from Portlock Park to the Salt Spring Indoor Tennis Centre to finish the final matches of the Gulf Islands Open under cover.

It was a changing of the guard in the men’s singles, with Salt Spring Island’s 15-year-old Scott Goddard taking down former local David Barclay, a multiple past winner of the men’s singles title who now lives in Victoria.

Goddard has been training with Salt Spring coaches Marjorie Blackwood and Peter Schelling for seven years, and is currently working with the new highly regarded Salt Spring Tennis Association coach Mukul Karthekanian (AKA McKoolio). The local adult tennis community has been instrumental in mentoring and hitting with Goddard over the years, giving him much needed matchplay and practice hours, something all our aspiring juniors will need as they develop their skills.

Gulf Islands Open Results:

Men’s singles: Scott Goddard defeated David Barclay 6-1, 6-3.

Men’s consolation: Nate Kray-Gibson defeated Michael Powell 4-6, 6-4, 10-4.

Men’s doubles: Andrew Ross-Collins/Blair Carley defeated Goddard/Kray-Gibson 6-3, 7-6.

Women’s doubles: Deborah Orange/Tracey McKinlay in a round-robin.

Mixed doubles: Carley/Orange defeated Jenny Pickering/Ross-Collins 6-3, 6-2.