Editorial: Smoke and mirrors

No one else will say it, so we will: the BC Ferries ban on immobile EVs made no sense in the first place. 

If we believe that electric vehicles burst into flames at a greater rate than cars filled with gasoline (it’s statistically the other way around, for various reasons) or that ferry crews aren’t capable of effectively fighting a hot, persistent lithium battery fire (the CEO of BC Ferries sat at Salt Spring Island Multi Space and told us the precise opposite), we have to ask: why would they let EVs aboard at all?

Short memories aside, all of humanity had a crash-course in the precautionary principle earlier this decade, and we’ve seen on Salt Spring Island more than once how even small e-bike batteries going wrong can threaten entire homes. With an EV’s battery pack being an order of magnitude larger, knowing how much the fire danger also increases would be helpful to guide policy in a region with more electric vehicles transiting every day.

Instead — and still absent any evidence an EV on a tow truck is more likely to suddenly catch fire than one that can limp itself aboard — islanders and ferry crews are going to take turns critiquing vehicle damage for clues the battery might be compromised.

If your electric vehicle is unable to move under its own power, according to BC Ferries’ website, “you will need to check” whether any damage is purely cosmetic. The policy helpfully calls out smoke, heat and “unknown fluids” leaks (as if any vehicle in such a state might have ever been permitted aboard) along with exposed wiring and signs of fire damage.

Then, at the terminal, each ferry’s crew will make a final determination on whether you’ll be allowed aboard. There’s no specific metric, but the sample pictures tell the story: flat tires, paint scratches, cracked windows and broken mirrors are considered cosmetic. For everything else, it’s a battery removal and a trip on the Dangerous Goods sailing.

That seems like a “good enough” idea for now. Charitably, the new policy seems to have taken pre-kerfuffle practices and codified a little common sense. But for a company that crunches numbers as exhaustively as BC Ferries, we wish this safety move was more transparently driven by data.

Sign up for our newsletter and stay informed

Receive news headlines every week with our free email newsletter.

Other stories you might like

First Battle of the Books a blast

BY VIOLET PENNER Grade 7 student, Fulford Community Elementary School At 11 a.m. Wednesday, May 20, at Fernwood Elementary School, the second of what we hope will...

Trustee Laura Patrick: Toward a more inclusive and resilient future for Salt Spring

By LAURA PATRICK After nearly eight years in public office as one of your two Salt Spring Island local trustees, I have decided that I...

Viewpoint: The politics of exclusion

By Frants Attorp Salt Spring trustees recently announced that work on our new Official Community Plan (OCP) will continue until the Trust elections in October....

SȾÁUTW̱ land project plans shared

The SȾÁUTW̱ (Tsawout) First Nation has announced plans for its reserve lands in WENÁ,NEĆ, also known as Fulford Bay, including a campground project, initially,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Weather

Salt Spring Island
overcast clouds
11.6 ° C
11.7 °
11.6 °
63 %
4kmh
100 %
Fri
12 °
Sat
12 °
Sun
13 °
Mon
13 °
Tue
13 °