Sunday, February 16, 2025
February 16, 2025

Letters to the editor – Jan. 8, 2025

Conflicts of interest

Salt Spring’s leading promoters of mass development certainly remind us who they are and what they stand for, shoulder-to-shoulder in last week’s Driftwood. 

Trustee Laura Patrick’s Viewpoint tries to justify the “insanity” of “doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result” (words she wrongly attributes to Einstein), though is otherwise vague about her latest scheme to “tweak” our official community plan (OCP).

In a longer and more revealing article, Salt Spring Solutions members claim to have tested their ideas with an online survey (sparsely responded), and in “confidential” meetings with “local housing providers” described as a dozen “landlords of legal and illegal housing.”

The team of trustee Patrick and Salt Spring Solutions is the same that brought us the Bylaw 530 fiasco. That push for mass upzoning wasted three years of our planners’ time, alienated the Tsawout First Nation (the only Indigenous group with treaty lands on Salt Spring) and would have contravened our OCP and the Islands Trust Act. Salt Spring Solutions was founded just months after the 2017 incorporation referendum, in which the losing side had been widely supported by pro-development interests opposed to the Islands Trust protections. Salt Spring Solutions often tells us it’s a “non-profit” organization. This means only that the organization itself isn’t a money-maker. It does not mean it is impartial and has nothing to gain from unleashed development. Several leading members have, or have had, business interests in real estate, property investment, construction and bulk water sales.

Do I “fear change” from Laura Patrick and her back-up band? You bet I do.

Ronald Wright,

Salt Spring

The other option

In last week’s Driftwood, trustee Laura Patrick and Salt Spring Solutions continued to depict a glowing everything-is-a-priority future while downplaying or ignoring the long-term consequences of their housing proposals and related policy changes.

Salt Spring Solutions claims their housing report was “peer reviewed,” but were those reviewing the recommendations made aware that implementation would require removal of quantified growth limits in our official community plan (OCP), thereby exposing a conservation area to open-ended growth — just like in any municipality? Did they support new bonus-density strata subdivisions, accessory dwelling units in all residential zones, and added dwellings on rural properties, mostly with no requirement of housing agreements to guarantee affordability and long-term occupancy? And did they have build-out data to determine the long-term impact on water, infrastructure, services and ecosystems?

More generally, did they endorse the shift from non-market affordable housing as emphasized in our OCP to widespread upzoning of private land, and weakening of all three pillars of the Islands Trust: the Islands Trust Act, the Trust Policy Statement and our OCP?

Project documents for the OCP update say the “process should consider opportunities to implement the recommended actions of this report.” Where does that leave non-market options?

In a November 2022 speech to the legislature, former MLA Adam Olsen stated: “Currently, the [housing] supply this Premier, his colleagues and the Minister of Housing are talking about are units fully exposed to market pressures. We need to build non-market housing units in B.C., including supportive housing, non-profit, co-op housing and housing that meets the specific needs of the communities.”

These sentiments have been echoed at public meetings by Capital Regional District director Gary Holman, who has cited existing OCP policies directing any upzoning to prioritize affordable housing, and new development to be located near existing settlements and transit lines.

The choice is not between housing and no housing, but rather, housing within the framework of the Islands Trust vs. broad densification that undermines the framework itself without achieving the desired results. It’s also a choice between two realities: the verifiable fact that legal documents protecting the environment are being severely weakened as opposed to trustee Patrick’s assertion that such amendments are “leading to a modernized and stronger Islands Trust.”

Frants Attorp,

Salt Spring

Sign up for our newsletter and stay informed

Receive news headlines every week with our free email newsletter.

Other stories you might like

Driftwood delayed until Thursday due to snow

The Feb. 5 edition of the Gulf Islands Driftwood newspaper will be available one day late due to this week's snowfall. The paper is...

Appeal court upholds Galiano LTC’s bylaw authority

B.C.’s Court of Appeal has dismissed an attempt by a group of Galiano Island property owners to reverse the 2023 dismissal of their lawsuit...

In Response: Our community needs empathy, not attacks, to solve its problems

By JASON MOGUS Last week’s paper held an interesting snapshot of life on Salt Spring in early 2025.  The lead story was how the median home...

Dec. 18 issue of the Driftwood in the mail

With the Canada Post strike now over, Driftwood subscribers can return to picking up papers in their mailboxes beginning with the Dec. 18 issue....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here