Editorial: Smoke and mirrors

No one else will say it, so we will: the BC Ferries ban on immobile EVs made no sense in the first place. 

If we believe that electric vehicles burst into flames at a greater rate than cars filled with gasoline (it’s statistically the other way around, for various reasons) or that ferry crews aren’t capable of effectively fighting a hot, persistent lithium battery fire (the CEO of BC Ferries sat at Salt Spring Island Multi Space and told us the precise opposite), we have to ask: why would they let EVs aboard at all?

Short memories aside, all of humanity had a crash-course in the precautionary principle earlier this decade, and we’ve seen on Salt Spring Island more than once how even small e-bike batteries going wrong can threaten entire homes. With an EV’s battery pack being an order of magnitude larger, knowing how much the fire danger also increases would be helpful to guide policy in a region with more electric vehicles transiting every day.

Instead — and still absent any evidence an EV on a tow truck is more likely to suddenly catch fire than one that can limp itself aboard — islanders and ferry crews are going to take turns critiquing vehicle damage for clues the battery might be compromised.

If your electric vehicle is unable to move under its own power, according to BC Ferries’ website, “you will need to check” whether any damage is purely cosmetic. The policy helpfully calls out smoke, heat and “unknown fluids” leaks (as if any vehicle in such a state might have ever been permitted aboard) along with exposed wiring and signs of fire damage.

Then, at the terminal, each ferry’s crew will make a final determination on whether you’ll be allowed aboard. There’s no specific metric, but the sample pictures tell the story: flat tires, paint scratches, cracked windows and broken mirrors are considered cosmetic. For everything else, it’s a battery removal and a trip on the Dangerous Goods sailing.

That seems like a “good enough” idea for now. Charitably, the new policy seems to have taken pre-kerfuffle practices and codified a little common sense. But for a company that crunches numbers as exhaustively as BC Ferries, we wish this safety move was more transparently driven by data.

Sign up for our newsletter and stay informed

Receive news headlines every week with our free email newsletter.

Other stories you might like

Release concert set for The Observer Effect

Award-winning musician Meredith Bates is promising an unforgettable night at All Saints After Dark on Thursday, May 21 when she unveils her new album...

Library hosts adventurous Sueño Bay show 

If you’ve ever wondered how a graphic novel is made, the answer is laid out in a fun and informative exhibition in the Salt...

Viewpoint: CRD partnerships valued

By GARY HOLMAN SSI CRD DIRECTOR I’m writing to clarify recent Driftwood articles regarding recycling at School District 64 (SD64), the Burgoyne composting facility, and the...

EVs with ‘cosmetic’ damage cleared to board

After an abrupt BC Ferries ban last summer — that for almost a year left about 1,000 vehicle owners on Salt Spring wondering how...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Weather

Salt Spring Island
broken clouds
11.2 ° C
11.8 °
10.4 °
83 %
5.1kmh
75 %
Wed
14 °
Thu
15 °
Fri
13 °
Sat
10 °
Sun
10 °